NeetCode 150 vs Striver SDE Sheet vs Blind 75: Which to Use in 2026

If you're preparing for Google, Amazon, Meta, or other top tech interviews, you've heard of Blind 75, NeetCode 150, and the Striver SDE sheet. Each is a curated list of data-structures-and-algorithms problems meant to cover what interviewers actually ask. The real question isn't which is "best" — it's which one fits your timeline and how to use it with company-specific prep and mock interviews. Here's a straight comparison and a simple way to choose.

Blind 75: The Minimal Core

Blind 75 is 75 problems originally shared on Blind to cover the most frequent interview patterns. It's short enough to finish in a few weeks and is still one of the most referenced lists. Pros: minimal set, high signal. Cons: no official order or videos; you often rely on LeetCode discussions or external resources. Many candidates use it as a "must-do" core before adding company-tagged problems. If you have limited time (e.g. 4–6 weeks) and want one list to prioritize, Blind 75 is a solid choice. Pair it with our DSA interview topics guide so you know which patterns to emphasize for Google or Amazon.

NeetCode 150: Pattern-Based with Videos

NeetCode 150 is 150 problems organized by pattern (arrays & hashing, two pointers, sliding window, stacks, binary search, etc.). Each problem has a video walkthrough that explains intuition and solution. Pros: learn by pattern, consistent quality, free tier is strong. Cons: slightly longer than Blind 75. NeetCode is often recommended over raw LeetCode when you want structure and explanation without hunting for good solutions. If you have 8–12 weeks and prefer learning by pattern with videos, NeetCode 150 is a strong default. Combine it with Uber, Netflix, or Meta question guides to see which patterns each company tends to ask.

Striver SDE Sheet: Topic-Ordered and Broad

The Striver SDE sheet (or SDE 180 list) is a topic-wise list — arrays, binary search, linked list, trees, graphs, DP, etc. — with easy-to-hard progression within each topic. It's very popular among candidates preparing for Indian tech companies and global roles. Pros: clear order, good coverage, free. Cons: no built-in videos on a single platform; you solve on LeetCode/other sites using the sheet as a roadmap. If you like a strict topic order and don't need videos in one place, Striver SDE sheet is a good fit. It overlaps with Blind 75 and NeetCode 150; doing one of those plus selected Striver problems can work, but doing two full lists is usually redundant. See our LeetCode alternatives for how Striver fits with other platforms.

Side-by-Side: When to Pick Which

Choose Blind 75 if you have 4–6 weeks and want the smallest high-impact set. Choose NeetCode 150 if you have 8+ weeks and want pattern-based learning with videos. Choose Striver SDE sheet if you prefer topic-wise order and are okay using LeetCode (or similar) for execution. Don't do all three end-to-end; pick one as your main list, finish it, then add company-tagged or pattern-specific problems. Quality and consistency beat volume. Add AI mock interviews and company interview guides so you're not only solving in isolation — you're practicing communication and company-specific expectations.

How to Use Your Chosen List Effectively

Whichever list you pick, work through it in order instead of jumping randomly. For Blind 75, many people follow the original order or group by pattern using a DSA topics guide so you hit arrays, then two pointers, then trees, and so on. For NeetCode 150, the built-in order is already pattern-based — do one pattern at a time and watch the video after attempting the problem. For the Striver SDE sheet, stick to the topic order (arrays → binary search → linked list → etc.) and do easy before medium before hard within each topic. Aim for consistency: 1–2 problems per day is more effective than binge-solving on weekends. Track what you get wrong and revisit those problems; our how to approach a DSA problem framework helps you practice the same process every time so you build habits, not just solutions.

Combining Your List with Company Prep and Mocks

A list alone won't tell you which patterns Google or Amazon ask most, or how many rounds to expect. Once you're halfway through your list, start reading company interview questions and process guides for your target companies — for example Google, Amazon, Meta, and Apple. In the last 2–4 weeks before your interview, add at least 2–3 mock interviews. AI mock interviews let you practice under time pressure and get feedback on how you explain your approach; peer mocks (e.g. Pramp) or platforms like Interviewing.io add variety. This combo — one list + company research + mocks — is what actually gets you ready. For a minimal resource plan, see our only DSA resources you need.

Common Mistakes When Choosing or Using a List

The biggest mistake is switching lists mid-way because someone said another list is "better." All three cover overlapping patterns; finishing one list beats starting three. Another mistake is doing problems without a consistent problem-solving approach — if you just look at solutions quickly, you won't build the muscle of clarifying, brute-forcing, and optimizing out loud. Finally, don't ignore non-DSA prep. System design matters for mid and senior roles; behavioral matters for every role. Use our FAANG interview prep and company guides to balance DSA with the rest of your loop.

Bottom Line

Blind 75 = minimal core. NeetCode 150 = pattern-based + videos. Striver SDE sheet = topic-ordered roadmap. Pick one list, complete it, then layer in company prep and mocks. When you're ready to test yourself in a realistic setting, try an AI mock interview tailored to your target company.